What the Campbell case establishes institutionally is that Content ID's enforcement logic creates an exploitable asymmetry: the system adjudicates ownership claims faster than any artist can dispute them, and the burden of proof falls on the original creator. Timeless Sounds IR used a distribution partner to insert the clone into the same commercial infrastructure that legitimate labels use — there was no technical difference Content ID could detect. The public domain status of Campbell's repertoire made the claim legally indefensible, yet YouTube processed it regardless. Platforms that built automated copyright…