The legal profession's repeated AI hallucination incidents reveal something important about how professional communities adopt tools: public punishment and peer awareness do not override the efficiency incentive. Disclosure rules remain uneven — Pennsylvania, for instance, has no statewide mandatory disclosure rule for AI use in court filings, leaving enforcement to individual judges' standing orders. The absence of a uniform obligation means each attorney makes an individual cost-benefit calculation without a floor. The result is that the profession's cautionary tales accumulate without producing systemic change — and in doing so, they…