Teachers Say AI Exposes Institutional Failure // AIDRAN

The policy conversation that consumed 2023 and 2024 — bans, detection tools, academic integrity offices issuing new guidelines — has not resolved. It has been superseded. The teachers who arrived at opposition to classroom AI through lived experience with the tools are not mostly spending their energy on plagiarism. They have concluded that the detection arms race was the wrong response to the wrong problem, and that the institutional energy spent on it revealed how little the assessment model was worth defending.

The AI-in-Education Argument Is Not About Cheating Anymore

Free reading limit reached

Sal Khan's Khanmigo Admission Resets Ed-Tech's AI Expectations

The Contract Nobody Read: Who Actually Negotiated AI Into Schools

AI Moves Into the LMS Before Higher Ed Has a Policy to Meet It

The AI Cheating Lawsuit That Landed in Silicon Valley

The AI Detection Trap Is Teaching Students to Write Badly

The MBA Cheating Crisis Exposed What Business Schools Never Measured

The Man Who Built the Digital Classroom Warns About Its Next Phase

AI Is Breaking the Institutions Meant to Catch It

Educators Mourn Pre-AI Learning as Hiring Shifts Toward 'AI Native'