Threat modeling and governance analysis are not competing answers to the same question — they address different audiences and foreclose different possibilities. The Latter Day Lens scenario where state actors bypass security infrastructure [1] does not invite the viewer to think about conformity assessments or liability frameworks; it invites them to think about enemies. Swisher's regulatory analogy — pharmacies, cars — does the opposite: it positions AI oversight as something legislatures have done before and can do again. The practical consequence is that one frame produces an audience primed…