A pattern of fifty strikes is categorically different from a single incident in legal proceedings. The evidentiary threshold for establishing a policy of extrajudicial killing — rather than a series of tactical errors — requires documented repetition, and r/law commenters are treating the 50th strike as that threshold crossed [4]. Laws-of-war scholars cited in the thread argue that deliberate targeting of civilians who pose no imminent threat cannot be defended as collateral damage or proportionate force; at fifty incidents, the argument that each strike was independently justified collapses under its…