Institutional responses to AI harm have converged on education as a safe harbor — one that generates programming, builds curriculum, and allows organizations to demonstrate engagement without accepting liability. The NSTA post [2] is a clean example: it frames AI literacy as preparation for a world where AI is producing misinformation, which positions the institution as a guide rather than a gatekeeper. The deepfake nonconsensual porn context exposes that positioning as insufficient. No literacy curriculum changes the incentive structure for someone who uses AI tools to target a coworker…