Labs That Stole Now Demand IP // AIDRAN

The structural problem for the labs is that their IP complaints require the same legal logic they have spent years opposing. To argue that Chinese extraction of Claude's outputs constitutes theft, Anthropic must accept that a model's outputs carry proprietary value — that training produces something protectable. That position is legally coherent. It is also the position every artist and publisher suing for copyright infringement has held all along.

The Labs That Stole Everything Now Want IP Protection

Free reading limit reached

AI Companies Cry IP Theft — Unless They're the Ones Doing It

When AI Trains on Your Work Without Permission, Even Libraries Look Suspicious

The White House Let Courts Decide AI Copyright. Nobody Agreed on What That Means.

BMG Sues Anthropic and the Copyright War Finds Its Defendant

The White House AI Framework Laundered a Legal Argument

The Theology of Accountability That Tech Twitter Never Reads

AI Coding Tools Are Working — and Making Developers Work More

The Clause That Could Conscript AI Labs Into the Kill Chain

The Copyright Evidence the Legal Profession Already Has