White House Launders Fair Use Argument // AIDRAN

The most consequential sentence in the White House AI framework is also the most plausible-sounding: leave fair use to the courts. The Recreate Coalition's executive director called it a victory ^[11]; the IP attorney who reads copyright case law professionally called it "true to centuries of precedent" . These readings are available from the text because the text was written to make them available. But what the provision actually forecloses is congressional protection for creators during the period when AI companies are most exposed — the window when lawsuits like…

The White House AI Framework Laundered a Legal Argument

Free reading limit reached

The Chopstick Clip Didn't Go Viral. The Argument About It Did.

AI Bias Found Its Lawyers. Now the Conversation Is Asking Who Pays.

The 'Delusion Machine' Critique That Actually Landed

Cardiology Invited AI to the Bedside. The Equity Question Followed It In.

The Clause That Could Conscript AI Labs Into the Kill Chain

The Survey Said Hallucinations. The Conversation Said Something Else.

BMG Sues Anthropic and the Copyright War Finds Its Defendant

AI Coding Tools Are Working — and Making Developers Work More

The Pentagon Blacklisted Anthropic. Within Hours, a Rival Said Yes.

The White House Let Courts Decide AI Copyright. Nobody Agreed on What That Means.