In brief
Somebody hunting for the best encyclopedic model to run on a modest machine asked whether the answer was still the "good ol' gpt-oss-120b from 2025". The model is little more than a year old. It is spoken of like a favourite chair: comfortable, familiar, and the thing people sit in while they decide whether something else is worth the download. That is the place gpt-oss holds among people who run models at home, and it is a stranger place than it sounds, because a favourite chair is rarely what people go shopping for.
AI Generated.
Under a published prompt · run 549. How runs are published
How people talked about gpt-oss
In the hardware threads, gpt-oss works as a unit of measurement for what a machine can hold. The 120b is said to run on a single DGX Spark with no trouble, and to fit on one A100 80GB. Those are reference points, the sizes people reach for when they want to say what a given box can carry. At the small end the same logic runs the other way: on a 6GB card, one person found that a long context pushed layers of experts back onto the CPU, which is a measurement of the card as much as of the model.
The 120b is also what people say they used to run. One person kept it as a daily driver until a Qwen model arrived that delivered the same or better text work and added vision. The old model appears in that account only as what was running before, and the story belongs to the replacement. Another, on a 128GB machine, says everything changed with the release of a Qwen model and a tool to go with it, and that they practically stopped using their OpenAI subscription. In both, gpt-oss is the line the newcomer had to clear.
The case for staying is narrow and practical. One person uses the model for backend and frontend work in Java, .NET and React and finds it pretty solid there, though they mostly run a Qwen model as the daily worker because it is twice as fast. That is a tool kept for a job. Another found the 20b comfortable on 16GB of VRAM and good at coding, and said a Qwen model would be the way to go on a bigger card.
Praise, when it comes, is lukewarm or technical. After spending a small amount on Ollama's pay-as-you-go cloud models, one person found the 120b "fine" and a rival model better at first glance. That is a flat grade, the kind given to a tool that did its job. The warmer note is about hardware: another finds the mixture-of-experts tier delivers, because the 120b on one A100 gives about the speed of a dense 30B model with the bigger model's headroom. Both are receipts about cost and fit more than endorsements of taste.
Away from the hardware threads, the model turns up as a part inside other people's projects. An insurance-fraud demo scores each claim twice with the same 120b, once alone and once with memory of past claims and investigator decisions, so the model is the constant and the memory is the variable. In builds like this the interest lies in what is wrapped around the model, and its name appears like a setting. An incident-memory agent sends its prompts to the 120b through Groq so that diagnostic reports lean on past resolutions. Neither argues for gpt-oss, which is named in passing, and that is what plumbing looks like.
The doubt is just as plain, and it comes from people who have used the model. One person keeps going back to it because they read that it does wonders, and every time it gives them wrong answers. That is a complaint about answers, and it sits oddly beside the hardware threads, where the argument is only about fit and speed. A longer verdict calls the models "overcooked": clever in a way that often misses being right, packed with heuristics and short on world knowledge, and so prone to hallucinations in that writer's view. That one is about a style of thinking, a different ground again.
Some of the doubts arrive with an asterisk about the stack around the model. One person saw hallucinations that had seemed the fewest with the 20b in web retrieval become noticeable, along with a habit of no longer admitting mistakes, then watched the trouble seem to clear after updating OpenWebUI, and suspected part of the cause was on the interface's side. A model that runs in so many setups is hard to judge apart from them. A comparison of the 20b running on a device against cloud models as coding agents came with the admission that a lot of the failures were the writer's own, so neither writer blames the model alone.
One person asks why Kimi K3 should not be distilled into GPT OSS 120B and 20B, a question that treats the pair as a ready-made container, a size and a shape with the contents still to be chosen. What it asks of gpt-oss is its dimensions, not its knowledge. A model that is asked for by its dimensions has stopped being a product and become a specification, something other models are poured into.
- Posts from
- 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · counted on Reddit (7 of 7 days), Bluesky (7 of 7 days), YouTube (7 of 7 days), Hacker News (7 of 7 days) and arXiv (6 of 7 days)
- Not counted
- Google News and Exa, no longer collected
- Method
- In development. Its methods are still being validated. What this means · Send feedback
- Publication
- Published 8 Oct 2026. In release 2026-W40.
- Released
- 8 Oct 2026
- Release
- 2026-W40
- Window
- 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026
- Version
- 1 · no revisions
- Next release
- Wednesday 14 Oct 2026
- Method
- 005c-series-v3.1
Communities
The communities the conversation about gpt-oss happened in, grouped by platform.
Redditeach track is gpt-oss’s 88 Reddit posts
- r/LocalLLaMA builders
The one community this reading stores; the rest of the track is posts in communities it doesn’t list.
arXiv
Posts about gpt-oss by community, 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026, as of 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z; in development. Each platform is drawn on its own scale. The word after each community is its type: who is there, not what it’s about (users are people who use one AI product; builders build with AI). A post counts once, in the community it was posted in.
This reading’s conditionsAs of 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z · 7 platforms · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026
- As of
- 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z
- Coverage computed
- 8 Oct 2026 21:23Z
- Facts checked
- 8 Oct 2026 22:01:30Z
How posts were linked to the subject
- Unambiguous alias, V2
- 104 posts linked. Precision 93.3% (95% interval 84.1% to 97.4%), n 60 links judged, 0 unclear, run 542.
Measured statements
In development Written by fixed rules from this reading’s stored figures. No model writes them.
On Reddit, 77 distinct people posted about gpt-oss between 28 September and 4 October 2026: 88 posts, an estimated 0.03% of that week's Reddit posts about AI, leaving out spam, bot, incentive and templated automated posts (100.0% of these posts had an identifiable author).
Reddit · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · author coverage 100.0% · 7 days: 7 active
5 more statements withheld. n 9 people, below the threshold of 20 people. No posts about gpt-oss on YouTube between 28 September and 4 October 2026. No posts about gpt-oss on Hacker News between 28 September and 4 October 2026. arXiv posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren’t counted. Withheld for a platform not counted this week: Exa.
Change
Nothing in this reading could be compared with the previous reading of gpt-oss, for 21–27 Sep 2026.
12 measures not compared, and why
- People posting about gpt-oss, Reddit. n 44 people between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. n 77 people between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change.
- People posting about gpt-oss, Bluesky. n 0 people between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. n 0 people between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 7 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 9 people, below the threshold of 20 people.
- People posting about gpt-oss, YouTube. n 0 people between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. n 0 people between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 4 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people.
- People posting about gpt-oss, Hacker News. n 0 people between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. n 0 people between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 people for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people.
- People posting about gpt-oss, arXiv. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: arXiv posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren't counted. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: arXiv posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren't counted.
- People posting about gpt-oss, Exa. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: Exa posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren't counted. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: Exa posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren't counted.
- gpt-oss’s share of Reddit posts. n 51 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 88 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change.
- gpt-oss’s share of Bluesky posts. n 13 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 13 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 13 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 13 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
- gpt-oss’s share of YouTube posts. n 4 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 0 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 4 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 0 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
- gpt-oss’s share of Hacker News posts. n 0 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 0 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 0 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 0 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
- gpt-oss’s share of arXiv posts. n 1 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 3 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: n 1 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: n 3 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
- gpt-oss’s share of Exa posts. n 0 posts between 21 and 27 September 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. n 0 posts between 28 September and 4 October 2026, below the threshold of 100 posts for a change. Between 21 and 27 September 2026: Not counted this week: Exa has no day between 21 and 27 September 2026 that AIDRAN counts, so there's no figure to show. Between 28 September and 4 October 2026: Not counted this week: Exa has no day between 28 September and 4 October 2026 that AIDRAN counts, so there's no figure to show.
Change compares this reading with the previous stored reading of the same subject, usually last week’s, and both endpoints stay visible with their dates. Each value carries its n; open it for its full conditions, coverage included. Stored weeks, above, cross eras, which marks a change in how weeks were captured: March era weeks were rebuilt from archives, with live capture from 7 Mar to 31 May, Archive backfill weeks were backfilled from archives (Reddit, Hacker News and arXiv only) and September era weeks were captured live from 16 Sep and filled in from archives.
Attention
How many people posted about gpt-oss on each platform, and gpt-oss’s share of that platform’s posts. One row per platform, each on its own terms.
n 88 posts · author coverage 100.0% · 7 days: 7 active · sample: 10 posts, one per author
Not counted this week. Exa has no day in this window that counts, so it has no figures here.
Bluesky. People hidden: n 9 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Share and posts hidden: n 13 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
YouTube. People hidden: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Share and posts hidden: n 0 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
Hacker News. People hidden: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Share and posts hidden: n 0 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
arXiv. People not applicable: arXiv posts are articles, which have no authors, so people aren’t counted. Share and posts hidden: n 3 posts, below the threshold of 20 posts.
In development. Spam, bot and incentive posts were removed with labels that agree with a stronger model at κ 0.74, below the 0.80 needed to drop this mark. The agreement is model-to-model.
Posts published 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026, as of 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z; in development. People count distinct platform identities and are never added across platforms. Share is gpt-oss’s posts over all posts AIDRAN captured on that platform in the window. Reddit’s posts include its comments. A normal share is gpt-oss's share of each platform's posts in the 17 earlier stored weeks of the same era (2026-W23, 2026-W24, 2026-W25, 2026-W26, 2026-W27, 2026-W28, 2026-W29, 2026-W30, 2026-W31, 2026-W32, 2026-W33, 2026-W34, 2026-W35, 2026-W36, 2026-W37, 2026-W38, 2026-W39), per platform. Its figures are in those readings. Choose any number to see what it rests on and the posts behind it.
gpt-oss in each platform’s table
Where gpt-oss sits among every ranked subject on each platform. The heavy mark is gpt-oss; every thin mark is another subject.
#24 of 41 on Reddit77 people · Claude 10,876 (#1)
41 ranked subjects, each a tick on Reddit’s own people scale, 0 to 10,876. 44 more subjects aren’t ranked: their people figures are hidden (n 0–18 people, below the threshold of 20), so they aren’t drawn.
Not ranked on Bluesky: n 9 people, below the threshold of 20 people. Not ranked on YouTube: n 0 people, below the threshold of 20 people.
Distinct people who posted about each subject on each platform, 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026, as of 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z, from release 2026-W40’s summary table (published). Each strip is on its own scale and nothing is added across platforms: one person can post on several. arXiv and Exa carry articles, which have no authors, so they have no ranking by people.
Stored weeks
gpt-oss in every week AIDRAN has stored so far, four weeks at a time (three on a phone), opening on this reading’s week.
W38–W40
W37–W40
People
W37
W38
W39
W40
Share of Reddit posts
W37
W38
W39
W40
gpt-oss’s people and share of platform posts, W01–W40, 40 stored weeks. Each chart is on its own scale from all of them. All 40 are in development; the open dot is this reading. Why a week is hidden or ringed is in the notes on stored weeks at the foot of this page.
What this reading rests on
| Platform | Days counted | How the posts were collected |
|---|---|---|
| 7 of 7 | Collected live | |
| Bluesky | 7 of 7 | Collected live |
| YouTube | 7 of 7 | Collected live |
| Hacker News | 7 of 7 | Collected live |
| arXiv | 6 of 71 still settling | Collected live2 days low capture, 1 day late heavy |
Not counted: Google News and Exa, no longer collected.
A day counts once it has settled: once the posts still expected for it are below the threshold, or, for posts loaded afterwards from an archive, once they’re loaded. Coverage day by day is in this reading’s conditions. How coverage is recorded.
Conditions
What every figure on this page rests on.
- As of
- 8 Oct 2026 12:00Z
- Coverage computed
- 8 Oct 2026 21:23Z
- Facts checked
- 8 Oct 2026 22:01:30Z
- Posts without facts
- 0
- Author coverage basis
- posts with an identifiable platform identity; article sources have none by definition
Coverage in this window, day by day for each platform, is drawn once: in the conditions rail beside the measured statements.
Coverage in this window
- 2026-09-28 · active
- 2026-09-29 · active
- 2026-09-30 · active
- 2026-10-01 · active
- 2026-10-02 · active
- 2026-10-03 · active
- 2026-10-04 · active
Bluesky
- 2026-09-28 · active
- 2026-09-29 · active
- 2026-09-30 · active
- 2026-10-01 · active
- 2026-10-02 · active
- 2026-10-03 · active
- 2026-10-04 · active
YouTube
- 2026-09-28 · active
- 2026-09-29 · active
- 2026-09-30 · active
- 2026-10-01 · active
- 2026-10-02 · active
- 2026-10-03 · active
- 2026-10-04 · active
Hacker News
- 2026-09-28 · active
- 2026-09-29 · active
- 2026-09-30 · active
- 2026-10-01 · active
- 2026-10-02 · active
- 2026-10-03 · active
- 2026-10-04 · active
arXiv
- 2026-09-28 · active · late heavy
- 2026-09-29 · active
- 2026-09-30 · active
- 2026-10-01 · active
- 2026-10-02 · active
- 2026-10-03 · active · low capture
- 2026-10-04 · active · low capture
Google News
- 2026-09-28 · no lane
- 2026-09-29 · no lane
- 2026-09-30 · no lane
- 2026-10-01 · no lane
- 2026-10-02 · no lane
- 2026-10-03 · no lane
- 2026-10-04 · no lane
Exa
- 2026-09-28 · no lane
- 2026-09-29 · no lane
- 2026-09-30 · no lane
- 2026-10-01 · no lane
- 2026-10-02 · no lane
- 2026-10-03 · no lane
- 2026-10-04 · no lane
Excluded: posts not about AI or unclear
Posts linked to gpt-oss that relevance run 61 labels not about AI or unclear, Reddit
Labels from relevance run 61, an open model.
n 0 posts · Reddit · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss that relevance run 61 labels not about AI or unclear, Bluesky
Labels from relevance run 61, an open model.
n 4 posts · Bluesky · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss that relevance run 61 labels not about AI or unclear, YouTube
Labels from relevance run 61, an open model.
n 0 posts · YouTube · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss that relevance run 61 labels not about AI or unclear, Hacker News
Labels from relevance run 61, an open model.
n 0 posts · Hacker News · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss that relevance run 61 labels not about AI or unclear, arXiv
Labels from relevance run 61, an open model.
n 0 posts · arXiv · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Each platform’s share is stated on its own and never combined.
Excluded: spam, bots and incentive posts
Posts linked to gpt-oss about AI that run 64 labels spam, bot or incentive, Reddit
Labels from run 64, an open model.
n 2 posts · Reddit · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss about AI that run 64 labels spam, bot or incentive, Bluesky
Labels from run 64, an open model.
n 14 posts · Bluesky · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss about AI that run 64 labels spam, bot or incentive, YouTube
Labels from run 64, an open model.
n 2 posts · YouTube · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss about AI that run 64 labels spam, bot or incentive, Hacker News
Labels from run 64, an open model.
n 0 posts · Hacker News · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss about AI that run 64 labels spam, bot or incentive, arXiv
Labels from run 64, an open model.
n 0 posts · arXiv · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Each platform’s share is stated on its own and never combined.
Excluded: templated automated posts
Posts linked to gpt-oss that templated-repetition rule run 518 flags as one account repeating a template, Reddit
Flags from rule run 518: clusters of 4 or more near-identical posts in the week where one account posted at least half. In blind checks of samples, about 9 in 10 flags were one account repeating a template.
n 4 posts · Reddit · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Posts linked to gpt-oss that templated-repetition rule run 518 flags as one account repeating a template, Bluesky
Flags from rule run 518: clusters of 4 or more near-identical posts in the week where one account posted at least half. In blind checks of samples, about 9 in 10 flags were one account repeating a template.
n 0 posts · Bluesky · 28 Sep – 4 Oct 2026 · 7 days: 7 active
Each platform’s share is stated on its own and never combined.
Not counted this week, so not shown: Exa.
These conditions were frozen when the reading was created and are never recomputed.
Not in this reading yet
Parts this method doesn’t produce yet. They’re named, never shown as empty.
- Frames
- Frames aren’t measured yet.
- Register
- Register isn’t measured yet.
- Frame evidence
- Quotes for frames come with frames. The quotes here are the fixed samples behind this reading’s figures.
Cite this reading
In development Published 8 Oct 2026. Release 2026-W40. Its figures never change: a correction or revision is a new reading. Cite it with its permanent link.
AIDRAN. 'gpt-oss', release 2026-W40, reading r_6c0b55864acc (v1). Published 8 October 2026.
Permanent link /r/r_6c0b55864acc
AIDRAN is the author and the publisher, so the citation names it once. Cite the permanent link, never a browse path.
Licensed CC BY 4.0: reuse it with this citation.
References
gpt-oss as its maker describes it. Chosen by hand and checked, and not part of the measurement.
Notes on stored weeksWhy the Stored weeks charts hide or ring a week: 3 coverage-limited platform weeks, each with its stored reason.
W10 coverage-limited: Partial day on Reddit: partial capture on 7 March 2026
W22 coverage-limited: Partial day on Reddit: partial capture on 31 May 2026
W38 coverage-limited: Partial day on Reddit: capture began at 00:24 UTC on 17 September 2026