Section 230's co-authors did not quietly retire from the debate — they entered it. Their Fortune op-ed conceding that AI is "uncharted territory" [4] is a primary source that plaintiffs' attorneys have already incorporated into briefs, and the co-authors' own updated position — that chatbots do not qualify for all of the statute's protections — is not a prediction about where law is heading, it is a legal argument being made in real time. When the people who wrote a law say it does not cover a category of technology,…