The week's AI-and-environment coverage split cleanly along a line that neither journalists nor corporate communications teams named explicitly: who is writing about what AI does versus who is writing about what AI costs. Nature published on flood prediction algorithms [11]. Stanford's seismic AI made headlines for mapping hidden fault structures beneath Campi Flegrei [6]. Euronews ran a piece on AI's role in post-disaster response coordination [8]. These are genuine scientific contributions, and the researchers behind them did not misrepresent their findings.