A year ago the dominant framing for AI-generated disinformation was anticipatory: the tools existed, the harm was plausible, the future was worrying. That framing required dispute — and generated it. The conversation this week operates on different terms. When a Bluesky post asserts that governments are already using AI to spread misinformation and people are simply accepting it , the observation lands without friction. No counter-argument. No demand for evidence. The conditional has collapsed into the declarative, and communities have updated their orientation from vigilance to navigation.