Court Keeps Databricks Copyright Case // AIDRAN

Reaching discovery changes the litigation's practical weight in ways the ruling's narrow language does not capture. Until now, Databricks could argue that the complaint failed on its face — that the authors had not adequately alleged copying tied to a specific model or a specific dataset. Breyer rejected that argument twice, and the second rejection means the company must now produce documentation: communications about dataset selection, contracts with data providers, internal records about what the DBRX training pipeline ingested. The is not a…

Databricks Cannot Shake Copyright Suit Over DBRX Training Data

Free reading limit reached

Washington Frames AI Distillation as a National Security Theft

AI Governance Has a Language Problem — and Insiders Are Saying It Out Loud

AI Governance Has the Mandate. The Machinery Is Another Problem.

LinkedIn's Default Opt-In Turned 930 Million Profiles Into Training Data

AI Copyright Litigation Has Left Theory Behind

AI Ethics Volume Spiked This Week. The Sources Explain Why.

The Gold Rush Frame Has Crossed Into the ROI Conversation

Anthropic Settled. That's the Only Number That Matters in AI Copyright Right Now.

The AI That Stole a Musician's Voice Then Sued Her for Singing It

The Paper That Turned a Legal Defense Into a Liability