What 'The AI Doc' establishes institutionally is a shift in how creative-rights claims are structured. For years the argument ran as a moral claim — artists were wronged, companies should stop. The documentary's framing names specific companies as having taken specific protected work without permission or compensation [1]. That move from categorical grievance to named defendant is the structural change: it invites a legal response rather than a policy discussion, and companies that ignored petitions cannot ignore a film with an Oscar-winning director attached. The [practical legal questions the Getty…