The researchers' argument this week names a practical constraint that most institutional conversations have avoided: LLM fundamentals require enough material that educators cannot simply add a module. One commenter stated it plainly — "you need so much material" that the addition demands cutting traditional content . This is the structural claim that makes the conversation consequential. It forces a choice between what a CS degree has historically been and what it now needs to be, and it makes every department's silence on the question a curricular decision by default. The…