Biden EO as Governance Reference // AIDRAN

What is being defended is not a policy but a structure. Biden's AI Executive Order offered something the current moment lacks: a sector-appropriate governance logic that compliance teams, federal procurement officers, and institutional AI programs could orient toward. The Bluesky observation that its 'early contours' represent 'complicated, nuanced and sector-appropriate policy' ^[8] is less a compliment to Biden than an indictment of the void that followed. The argument is not that the EO was sufficient — it is that it provided a framework against which sufficiency could be measured. The…

Biden's AI Order Returns as a Reference Point, Not a Rallying Cry

Free reading limit reached

Bipartisan AI Regulation Consensus Collapses Into Competing Agendas

Bipartisan Consensus on AI Regulation Masks a Deeper Disagreement

Europe's AI Act Is Law. Its Meaning Is Still Being Negotiated.

Chrome's Silent 4 GB Download Exposes the Consent Gap in AI Governance

Chrome's Silent AI Install Handed Congress a Regulation Argument

Security Scares Are Doing What Lobbyists Could Not

AI Is Breaking the Institutions Meant to Catch It

Singapore's Agentic AI Rulebook Arrives While the West Debates Vocabulary

AI Regulation Is Failing Because It Governs the Wrong Thing

AI Agents Are Running Wild — and Regulators Are Just Now Noticing