Convention controversies over AI-generated art have almost always centered on finished work — a cover that used AI imagery, a graphic novel interior that looked algorithmically produced. The WonderCon incident broke that pattern. The contested object was a panel flyer: promotional infrastructure, not creative output submitted for artistic judgment. That distinction is what gave Deibert's withdrawal its particular force. She was not arguing against someone else's aesthetic choice. She was objecting to her own name being attached, without her knowledge, to an image made with a tool she has publicly…