The Bluesky post that surfaced the Michael memorandum had a documentary quality that made editorial framing unnecessary [18]. The question — when was this written? — was paired with the relevant passage: Anthropic's refusal of an "all lawful use" clause and its AI safety advocacy characterized as evidence of an "adversarial posture" enabling "model poisoning" and "denial of service" risks. What the post did was force a rereading of Anthropic's entire federal trajectory. A lab that had entered defense contracting on the premise that its safety commitments were an asset…