Artists Reject Jensen's Take on AI Art // AIDRAN

Jensen Huang's endorsement of AI art did not land as a compliment — it landed as confirmation that the people building these tools are not listening to the people most affected by them. The artists responding on Bluesky are making a structural argument: that aesthetic praise from a hardware executive is not a rebuttal to claims about labor displacement and unconsented training data ^[1]. The UK Parliament reached a structurally identical conclusion through different means — the explicitly…

Jensen Says AI Art Is Beautiful. Artists Say He Missed the Point.

Free reading limit reached

The Contaminated Market: When Authenticity Requires Forensic Effort

Crimson Desert's AI Art Fix Was a Blur, Not a Correction

DLSS 5 Didn't Just Change a Face — It Changed the Argument

The Copyright Deadline That Revealed a Movement Growing Up

Australia's Copyright Backdoor for AI Training, Exposed

Artists Are Winning Legal Battles and Losing the Aesthetic War

When Artists Start Doubting Their Own Hands

The Art Direction Is Getting Flattened and Game Communities Know It

On Bluesky, Creative Rejection of AI Art Is the Default Position

Crimson Desert and the Art Theft Argument That Became a Vow